...am unable to agree with the judgment in this case and that I think it my duty to express my dissent. "This case is decided upon an economic theory which...that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that rny agreement or disagreement has nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinions...

...Holmes, in his separate dissenting opinion, goes even more fundamently into the question at issue: " ' This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain. ... It is settled by various decisions of this court that State constitutions and State laws may regulate...

...judg198 US HOLMES, J., dissenting. ment in this case, and that I think it my duty to express my dissent. This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part pf the .country does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should...

...think it my duty "h^'court* to express my dissent. This case is decided upon an economic ba*-'j uP°n theory which a large part of the country does not...strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement had nothing to do with the right of a majority to embody their opinions in law. It is settled by various...

...the Court, and it was the occasion of a most striking dissenting opinion by Justice Holmes. He says : "This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country do not entertain. If it were a question whether I agreed with that theory, I should desire to study...

...these minority opinions is his dissent in the New York bake-shop case,3 in which, inter alia, he said, "This case is decided upon an economic theory which...it further and long before making up my mind. But / do not conceive that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that my agreement or disagreement...

...the majority opinion of the United States supreme court which held against the New York Bakeshop law, This case is decided upon an economic theory which...does not entertain. If it were a question whether I agree with that theory, I should desire to study it further and long before making up my mind. But...

...Mr. Justice Holmes, in his dissenting opinion in Lochner c. New York ( 198 US, 45, p. 75 ) , says : This case is decided upon an economic theory which...country does not entertain. If It were a question of whether I agreed with that theory I should desire to study it further and long before making up...

...theory I should desire tc study it fttr'her am] long before making up my mind. But I Jo not eonci-irf that to be my duty, because I strongly believe that...my agreement or disagreement has nothing to do with thi right of a majority fo enact their opinion in few." He insists that the courts should not let the...

...living, are mere meddlesome interferences with the rights of the individual "; and Justice Holmes says " This case is decided upon an economic theory which a large part of the country does not entertain," and again " But a constitution is not intended to embody a particular economic theory, whether of paternalism...