I will, at the enfuing feflions, move In the jails of the metropolis, and in many others, an abominable cuftom prevails, the very difgrace of a country termed termed criminals. I have given you only a few of the regulations refpecting them, which are peculiar to this jail. They are, befides, fubjected to the more general rules enforced by fome late acts of parliament. Solitary confinement, although in the opinion of the majority of thofe who have confidered the fubje&t, the beft poffible method of reclaiming young offenders, (and under fuch management it is to be hoped they will all be of that defcription hereafter) has yet its opponents. A late writer, one of those who is for overturning all establishments, calls it tyrannical and fevere, and then runs into a long declamation about focial affections. But if he would have given himself the trouble to read, (and fuch overthrowers of fyftems are too wife for that) he would have found his objections completely anticipated and answered. It is acknowledged, that those who would difpenfe folitude in the grofs, or with general or unallayed feverity, would do well to weigh its corroding effects on a mind loaded with guilt, and withheld from that habitual intoxication, which banishes reflection in the profligate they would then feel, that it is fomething more than a mere mode of keep ing, to be arbitrarily applied it will furely appear to deferve fome kind of fentence of the law for its fanction. Solitude,' fays the worthy baronet I have already quoted, with due attention to its effects, will, I doubt not, reform the most hardened criminal, and without attention it ought never to be applied.' So much is he impreffed with the neceffity of fuch attention, that he adds, fhould it ever again happen, that magiftrates fhould neglect an inspection into the confequences of their own commitments, or relapfe into a state of ignorance and infenfibility to the fituation, to which they fentence offenders; in fuch cafe, it will be the duty of the court of quarter feffions, immediately to fufpend all punishments by folitary confinement, within any prifon fo neglected. In no cafe does the law prefume the Juftice ignorant of the ftate of the prifon to which he commits to punishment. As to folitary imprifonment, it must not exift longer than it is attended to. The plan of our prifons will be found to poffefs many great advantages, independent of the idea of folitude. Solitude thould be ftrictly enforced, until reflection be pro- . duced; bat fomething thould then be offered, as the fubject of reflection. Total uninterrupted folitude will either diftract or fupify the mind. I fhould prefume it will feldom reclaim it.' The advocates, therefore, for folitary confinement are by no means ignorant that, in order to produce proper effects, it must be modified and regulated according to circumstances. Whether it be confidered as a punishment, or as a means of reclaiming the vicious, it is never applied indifcriminately. Indifcriminate punishments answer no other purpose than to confound all crimes. To prevent this objection, there are, as I have told you, feveral degrees appointed of folitary confinement, each of which are appropriated to a clafs of men who poffefs a correfponding degree of guilt, refractoriness, or hardness of heart. No plan furely ever offered fairer to be fuccefsful; but no plan can be expected to produce a perfect effect. This is now in its infancy: a few years will fhew whether, and to what degree, it is practicable; prima facie, it is undoubtedly preferable to the common management of jails, because, indeed, nothing can be worse, or fo bad; and it depends on the magiftrates, and on the public themfelves, whether their own expectations fhall be realized. But I fhall not have mentioned all the public advantages to be derived from the conftitution of this prison, until I have laid before you the manner in which another fpecies of prifoners are treated. The treatment of debtors was always a fubject of enquiry with Mr. Howard; and you may recollect, recollect, that he was fcarcely ever order of them, may fuch prifoner any relief from the county tock, not exceeding the ordinary allowance to felens, &c. or may affift him in procuring his groats. I have only to add, on this head, that the debtors are regulated, in every other part of their conduct, by the rules of very strict, though by no means oppreffive, difcipline. They are debarred from gaming, drinking, and every thing that may hurt them. Such are some of the laws observed in the government of a jail erected, not fo much for the purposes of punifhment, as of reformation. If I have exceeded the bounds of my former letters in this detail, I have only to plead, that fuch a fubject must be dear and interefting to you, my dear fir, and to every man who confiders the prefent deplorable state of the criminal pcor. We fhall not probably banish crimes by fuch means, but they will, I flatter myself, be attended with circumstances of less atrocity in the commiflion, and with a more falutary penitence after they have been committed. Other punithments may yet be neceffary, but they will be more effectual both to the criminal and to the public. There have been only two initances of capital punishment fince this jail was erected. The place of execution is a platform raised confiderably above the roof of the jail, and commands a prospect of the whole city, from whence the awful folemnity may be witneffed. Where fights of this kind are not frequent, they generally leave very lafting impreflion. In the metropolis they are fo common, that, if I may use the phrafe, nobody thinks it worth his while to fee them. If I have not imbibed mistaken notions on this fubject, the utmost that any legiflature can do, is to moderate, or leffen the more outrageous kinds of wickedness. To expel them entirely, is not in the power of man, and they who aim at perfection, will probably fall fhorter of doing any kind of good, than those whole ex pectations pectations are lefs fanguine. Were afraid that one prifon only for foli- On the PREPOSSESSIONS of a FIRST SIGHT. SIR, TH HE fcience of phyfiognomy, or phyfingnomony, as Lavater has termed it, appears to have a greater degree of prefumption in it than any other fpecies of natural or acquired knowledge to which men can attain. Whether it is capable of being reduced to certain rules, and taught like other sciences, as that fame writer maintains, may at least be doubted, if not contradicted, on the frongest evidence of reafoning and experience. It is indifputable, that we are apt to form fome opinion of a man at firft fight; but as we feldom or never can affign a reafon why we form fuch an opinion, it follows that if we are right, we are right by chance, or by fome kind of initin, or fecret kind of knowledge, wholly incommunicable; and if we thould be right in a number of fuch inftances, we cannot impart our knowledge to another; and, therefore, phyfiognomy, or phyfiognomony, is not a feience to be taught like any other. It is, at beft, a fort of inftinct given to man, as inftinct is given to the beafts, to enable them to distinguish one kind of herb from another, and to guard them from accidents. Why, from merely feeing a man, we are inclined to love or hate him, to have a good or a bad opinion of him, we can no more tell, than why the animal which is grazing will avoid poisonous, and feed only upon the wholefome, appropriate productions of the earth. The writer of this letter may lay' claim to a confiderable portion of phyfiognomical knowledge, were it worth boafting of, or could he communicate it. He has, without knowing why, been led to form a certain opinion of people at first fight, and this opinion he has never in one inftance found to be wrong. He has, indeed, in the courfe of a more intimate acquaintance, found reafon to change it; but in the course of a longer acquaintance than that, he has been perfectly fenfible that his first opinion, formed without any acquaintance at all, has proved to be the true one. Moit men have this kind of knowledge in a greater or leffer degree; but it may be doubted whether it adminifters much to their comfort, 02 whether whether it may not often be mistaken, and whether, as prejudice is a weed of ftrong growth in the human mind, it be not dangerous to recommend it to others, or to make it known. Were the works of Lavater generally ftudied, I am fully perfuaded that we fhould foon become an age of impertinents, prefumptuously deciding upon each others characters with out the leaft foundation. Phyfiogromony, even as he has explained it, is but the fcience of conjecture. You may be right, but you may also be wrong, and you have nothing but experience to tell you whether you are the one or the other; and experience will inform you of a man's character, without your having had the trouble to form an opinion of him at firft fight. Mens' characters, if phyfiognomy be true, muft always be the fame, which we know is rarely the cafe; the character of the child, the youth, the man, and the greybeard, are very different, while the changes in the countenance are not fuch as change of character gives, but fuch as are brought on by the progrefs of years, or rather the progrefs of man from health to diffolution. Can we know nothing, then, from looking a man in the face?-Yes, a great deal; we can tell whether he be angry or well-pleafed, healthy or fick, young or old; but we cannot tell even this without risk of error; for fome mens features are not happily adapted to exprefs the paffions; and, befides, we differ in our ideas of health and fickness. Many men, too, particularly ftudious men, acquire a look of greater age than belongs to them; while others, from trong health, neatness of perfon, and agility of motion, appear to be much younger than they really are. But it was not my design when I took up the pen, to write against Layater's fystem. It has many beauties, contains much information, and every where difplays the piety and philanthropy of the author. My purpofe, Mr. Editor, was to complain of a kind of phyfiognomical knowledge which has prevailed in this country, long before Lavater's researches were begun I mean that very happy faculty which fome people have of knowing men at first fight, by certain figns and fymptoms, which do not enter into Lavater's fyftem. People of fashion will know the character of a man from the curl of his hair, the cut of his coat, or the bow he makes at entrance, and judge of him accordingly. They likewife have a most penetrating eye in difcovering not only the character of the perfon, but even the business he comes about. They can read in his countenance whether he comes to receive or pay a bill, and regulate their behaviour accordingly, putting on a becoming gravity and earneftnefs, or a grateful kindly smile, according to circumftances. A plebeian, too, is no mean phyfiognomift in his way; when he prefents his bill he knows, at the first glance, whether it will be paid or not; and when he meets a great man with a fmile on his countenance, he is fure that he wants fenicthing, a fresh parcel of goods, longer credit, or perhaps, once in feven years, a vote. An acquaintance with this kind of phyfiognomony faves a great deal of unnecflary converfation, and confequently may prevent that difagreeable altercation, which is very apt to follow from the converfation of two men, one of whom owes, and cannot pay, and the other wants, and cannot have Lavater is a man of genius and penetration, and a good deal of entertainment may be found in his book; but I am afraid it will not teach fagacity to thote on whom nature has not bestowed that talent, nor form to habits of minute attention thofe who are bab' tually inattentive; and if it fhould encourage the unfkilful to form tash judgments, there is reafon to apprehend that it may do more harm than good.'-Beattie's Elements of Moral Science. patience, |