The Hague Court and Vital Interests

Stevens and sons, limited, 1905 - 11 páginas

Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario

No encontramos ningún comentario en los lugares habituales.

Páginas seleccionadas

Términos y frases comunes

Pasajes populares

Página 8 - Differences which may arise of a legal nature or relating to the interpretation of treaties existing between the two Contracting Parties and which it may not have been possible to settle by diplomacy...
Página 8 - July, 1899 ; Taking into consideration that by Article XIX of that Convention the High Contracting Parties have reserved to themselves the right of concluding Agreements, with a view to referring to arbitration all questions which they shall consider possible to submit, to such treatment...
Página 8 - July 29, 1899, at The Hague, on condition, however, that neither the vital interests, nor the independence or honour of the two Contracting States, nor the interests of any State other than the two Contracting States, are involved.
Página 6 - With the object of facilitating an immediate recourse to arbitration for international differences, which it has not been possible to settle by diplomacy...
Página 5 - VIII) shall be judges of the Supreme Court of the United States, or justices of the Circuit Courts to be nominated by the President of the United States...
Página 7 - In case of serious disagreement or dispute, before an appeal to arms, the contracting powers agree to have recourse, as far as circumstances allow, to the good offices or mediation of one or more friendly powers.
Página 5 - ... award shall be of no validity. In the event of an award made by less than the prescribed majority and protested as above provided, or if the members of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be equally divided, there shall be no recourse to hostile measures of any description until the mediation of one or more friendly Powers has been invited by one or both of the high contracting parties.
Página 5 - States, whose award by a majority of not less than five to one shall be final. In case of an award made by less than the prescribed majority, the award shall also be ßnal, unless either power shall, within three months after the award has been reported, protest that the same is erroneous, in which case the award shall be of no validity.
Página 9 - ... of veto at the treaty ratification stage. Here the possibilities are endless, of course, from the federal constitutional-institutional viewpoint: one possibility, looking now to recent federal government and provincial proposals for reform and restructuring of the federal Senate, might be to require all treaties to be submitted for ratification to the Senate, the Senate necessarily having been reconstituted, on this hypothesis, as a provincially-appointed or elected, essentially "provincial rights,
Página 6 - Brussels, which has remained unratified to the present day. "8. To accept in principle the employment of good offices, of mediation and facultative arbitration in cases lending themselves thereto, with the object of preventing armed conflicts between nations ; to come to an understanding with respect to the mode of applying these good offices, and to establish a uniform practice in using them.

Información bibliográfica