Antiquity as the Source of Modernity: Freedom and Balance in the Thought of Montesquieu and BurkeRoutledge, 2017 M07 28 - 151 páginas This is a book that contrary to common practice, shows the commonalities of ancient and modern theories of freedom, law, and rational actions. Studying the works of the ancients is necessary to understanding those that follow. Thomas Chaimowicz challenges current trends in research on antiquity in his examination of Montesquieu's and Burk's path of inquiry. He focuses on ideas of balance and freedom. Montesquieu and Burke believe that freedom and balance are closely connected, for without balance within a state there can be no freedom.When Montesquieu speaks of republics, he means those of antiquity as they were understood in the eighteenth century. In this view, freedom can develop only within the framework of established tradition. Edmund Burke's greatest service to political thought may lie in making use of this idea when he fought against the abstractions of the French Revolutionaries. Antiquity as the Source of Modernity examines Montesquieu's Roman mind, meaning not an attitude influenced by the ancients, but one primarily influenced by Roman heritage. It speaks to the antithesis of monarchy and despotism in Montesquieu's thought and the influence of Tacitus and Pliny the Younger on him. The separation of powers and its relation to the concept of the mixed constitution as well as Montesquieu's smaller masterpiece Considerations on the Causes of the Grandeur and Decadence of the Romans are examined in detail. Finally, the discussion leads seamlessly to Burke, who, as a critical admirer of Montesquieu, partly incorporated his interpretation of the English constitution into his own thinking threatened by teachings of the French Revolution and its British adherents.The central idea of Antiquity as the Source of Modernity is timeless. It is that the ancient past can lead to a clearer understanding of what follows. This perspective represents a reversal of the conventional procedures for conducting this kind of research, |
Dentro del libro
Resultados 1-5 de 37
Página
... says the same thing in the eleventh book of De l'Esprit des Lois: “On ne peut jamais quitter les Romains”—“One can never leave the Romans behind (Lois XI, 13).” In chapter fifteen of the Considérations sur les causes de la grandeur des ...
... says the same thing in the eleventh book of De l'Esprit des Lois: “On ne peut jamais quitter les Romains”—“One can never leave the Romans behind (Lois XI, 13).” In chapter fifteen of the Considérations sur les causes de la grandeur des ...
Página
... says the following about this emphasis on the republic17 : The republic is a virtuous and admirable form of government ; but at no point in L'Esprit des lois does Montesquieu offer the slightest suggestion that it has any relevance to ...
... says the following about this emphasis on the republic17 : The republic is a virtuous and admirable form of government ; but at no point in L'Esprit des lois does Montesquieu offer the slightest suggestion that it has any relevance to ...
Página
... says that aristocracy ( the aristocratic republic ) does , indeed , require virtue , but not to the same extent as ... say , the prejudice of each person and of each condition , takes the place of the political virtue of which I have ...
... says that aristocracy ( the aristocratic republic ) does , indeed , require virtue , but not to the same extent as ... say , the prejudice of each person and of each condition , takes the place of the political virtue of which I have ...
Página
... says , “ Il [ l'honneur ] peut ... conduire au but de gouvernement comme la vertu même " - " Honor can conduce to the end of government as well as virtue " -he simply means that , by a different path , a monarchy can reach the same goal ...
... says , “ Il [ l'honneur ] peut ... conduire au but de gouvernement comme la vertu même " - " Honor can conduce to the end of government as well as virtue " -he simply means that , by a different path , a monarchy can reach the same goal ...
Página
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Alcanzaste el límite de visualización de este libro.
Contenido
Monarchy as Opposed to Despotism | |
The Concept of the Mixed Constitution and the Separation | |
Montesquieus Considérations sur les Causes de la Grandeur | |
Heredity and Freedom in Burkes Mixed Constitution | |
Ideal and Reality | |
Conclusion | |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Antiquity as the Source of Modernity: Freedom and Balance in the Thought of ... Thomas Chaimowicz Vista previa limitada - 2011 |
Antiquity as the Source of Modernity: Freedom and Balance in the Thought of ... Thomas Chaimowicz Sin vista previa disponible - 2008 |
Términos y frases comunes
already American Order ancient Annals antiquity balance Bolingbroke Burke's Caesar chapter Cicero concept Considérations Dedieu democracy democratic despotism dictatorship Dionysius of Halicarnassus Edmund Burke England English constitution esprit général État example existed freedom French Revolution Friedrich Friedrich von Gentz Gentz Gerhard Ritter German Germania Hamilton hereditary Hippolyte Taine historian Ibid idea importance influence intellectual J.G.A. Pocock king Kramnick l'Esprit des Lois later Latin liberty Livy Livy's Machiavelli means Michael Rostovtzeff mixed constitution modern monarchy Montesquieu Montesquieu and Burke nation natural aristocracy parliament party passage Pensées peuple political politique Polybius portrayal pouvoir president prince principatus principles publica qu'il reference regarding republic republican république non libre Revolution in France Roman Empire Rome Roots of American Rossiter Russell Kirk says Senate separation of powers Shackleton spirit Suetonius Tacitus Tacitus's theory Thomas Chaimowicz thought translation tyranny vertu Vespasian virtue words writes