Debating the Democratic PeaceMichael E. Brown, Sean M. Lynn-Jones, Steven E. Miller MIT Press, 1996 M05 10 - 414 páginas Are democracies less likely to go to war than other kinds of states? This question is of tremendous importance in both academic and policy-making circles and one that has been debated by political scientists for years. The Clinton administration, in particular, has argued that the United States should endeavor to promote democracy around the world. This timely reader includes some of the most influential articles in the debate that have appeared in the journal International Security during the past two years, adding two seminal pieces published elsewhere to make a more balanced and complete collection, suitable for classroom use. |
Contenido
82 | 38 |
Why Democratic Peace? Bruce Russett | 80 |
The Insignificance of the Liberal Peace David E Spiro | 235 |
On the Democratic Peace Christopher Layne | 358 |
Reflections on the Liberal Peace and its Critics Michael W Doyle | 364 |
Otras ediciones - Ver todas
Debating the Democratic Peace Michael E. Brown,Sean M. Lynn-Jones,Steven E. Miller Sin vista previa disponible - 1996 |
Debating the Democratic Peace Michael E. Brown,Sean M. Lynn-Jones,Steven E. Miller Sin vista previa disponible - 1996 |
Términos y frases comunes
alliance American Political Science analysis anocracy argues argument autocracy autocratic Britain British Bruce Russett Burgess century chap Cold War Conflict Resolution constitutional countries crises crisis data set demo democ democratic dyads democratic norms democratic peace proposition democratic peace theory disputes domestic political Doyle dyad-years economic elites empirical explain Fashoda Fashoda Crisis fight Finland foreign policy France French Grasping the Democratic illiberal Imperial Germany institutions interests International Conflict international politics international relations International Security John Burgess Journal of Conflict Kant Layne liberal democracies liberal dyads Liberal Legacies liberal peace liberal regimes London Maoz and Russett military nations nondemocracies nonliberal period Political Science Political Science Review Princeton University probability R.J. Rummel realist regime change regime type republican republics significant social Soviet Spiro statistical strategic structure studies threat United University Press war-prone wars between democracies welfare liberals Wilson Woodrow Wilson World Politics World War II York