Supersense: From Superstition to Religion - The Brain Science of Belief
Little, Brown Book Group, 2009 M06 1 - 160 páginas
Why is it that Tony Blair always wore the same pair of shoes when answering Prime Minister's Questions? That John McEnroe notoriously refused to step on the white lines of a tennis court between points? And that President-elect Barack Obama played a game of basketball the morning of his victory in the Iowa primary, and continued the tradition the day of every following primary?
Superstitious habits are common. Do you ever cross your fingers, knock on wood, avoid walking under ladders, or step around black cats? Sentimental value often supersedes material worth. If someone offered to replace your childhood teddy bear or wedding ring with a brand new, exact replica, would you do it? How about £20 for trying on a jumper owned by Fred West?
Where do such feelings come from and why do most of us have them? Humans are born with brains designed to make sense of the world and that need for an explanation can lead to beliefs that go beyond reason. To be true they would have to be supernatural. With scientific education we learn that such beliefs are irrational but at an intuitive level they can be resistant to reason or lie dormant in otherwise sensible adults.
It now seems unlikely that any effort to get rid of supernatural beliefs or superstitious behaviours will be completely successful. This is not all bad news - such beliefs are a useful glue that binds us together as a society.
Combining brilliant insight with witty example Hood weaves a page-turning account of our 'supersense' that navigates a path through brain science, child development, popular culture, mental illness and the paranormal. After reading SuperSense, you will realize why you are not as reasonable as you might like to think - and why that might be no bad thing.
Comentarios de la gente - Escribir un comentario
Regarding Doctor Duncan MacDougall, and the weight of a soul, psychologist Bruce Hood wrote that "because the weight loss was not reliable or replicable, his findings were unscientific".
I understand that Bruce hood, who may not be qualified to get the full report, because of patient doctor confidentiality, and that he is a relationship expert and not scientist related, so I offer this:
The 5 Doctors submitted a 1,901 page report with 52 cites. The American Medical association was so impressed, they did a 7 page special article.
As for the validity of the test as compared to lets say the conjecture of the last comment, the 5 doctors who did the test do not then spend the rest of their life searching for a way to show people what they found if they found nothing.
If the relationship expert, Bruce Hood (psychologist), was not so shallow, he would have noted that. If Bruce Hood were qualified he certainly could repeat the experiment and then have a foundation for real commentary.
True they did not all weigh the same, and yet logic firmly dictates even if different weight for each, you cannot say it is not there.