Imágenes de páginas
PDF
EPUB

infubordination is progreffive, and the rulers of France have converted it into an inftrument of conqueft. How is the form to be laid, and the revolution turned even to good? By convincing nations that they have, in reality but one general intereft, which has been facrificed in the general destruction; that, in order to prevent fimilar explofions in any one of them in future, they ought to maintain the inviolability of property and public credit; and that the permanent interefts of every ftate depend on the general ftock, and not upon a momentary fuperiority, or the little profits of a nar row rivality."

any

Since the era of the conftitution of 1795, it was farther urged, and the efficacious measures adopted for the fuppreffion of anarchy, and the protection of perfons and property, there cannot reasonably exift difficulty relative to the form of government of the two nations, the one and the other of which have founded their political fafety upon the fame bafis; taxes eftablished through a conftitutional reprefentation. If those who govern the French republic be difpofed to propofitions of peace, in the fpirit of philanthropy, and on the ground of mutual intereft, the difpute, from that moment, will become a generous emulation in favour of the rights of humanity.-Commerce and agri. culture will re-establish the bonds of reciprocal advantage; funds will be fet apart for the relief of thofe who have ferved, or fuffered, during the war and a connection will be formed between the public creditor, the landed proprietor, and the induftrious manufacturer, which

will compel them to fupport the tranquillity of their country, both external and internal. By a cellaton of arms, faid the patrons of thefe generous doctrines; by the difplay of a sincere and ardent defire of good neighbourhood, and juftice and good-will to all nations, let us foothe, foften, and harmonize, the minds of Frenchmen into the fame tone in which they were in the firft ftage of the revolution: when they abandoned the glory of conqueft for the fublimer praile of a free conflitution, to be framed, in all its relations, on the ground of morality. "The friend of mankind, loofening from the fore, on an element, free and open, by nature, to all nations, and indulging fentiments which fuch a fituation naturally infpires, cafts his eyes on the one fide to the cliffs of Dover, on the other to thofe of Calais, dif joined, like the French and English nations, from one another, though, like them, fundamentally the fanie, yet each retaining its pofition in peace. The foils of France and England are not at war with each other: nor the plants; nor the animals; nor the harmless pealants; nor the labouring poor, of any clafs; nor the commercial men, whofe interefts, rightly understood, are the fame; nor, in general, the great body of the French and Englii.— Whence, then, the difcord and din of arms? From the narrow ambi tion of a few individuals, who, from blind paflion, or fordid avarice, facrifice, to their felfifh views, the good of their country. Is it not poffible to animate, by the breath of unbounded philanthropy, fome patriots of expanded fouls in both

See Correspondence between a Traveller and a Minister of State,

nations, who may rife fuperior to fuch cruel as well as contracted confiderations, and controul the am: bition of courts, by the nobler ambition of promoting the welfare of nations? In fuch hands might it not be expected, that a negociation for peate night not yet be in vain.”*

Such were the principles of a party which was formed, or forming, at this time, not only in the British parliament and nation, but in France, Germany, and other parts of Europe. They did not advife to throw away the arms of terror; but, on the contrary, through military preparation, on a grand fcale,+ to prevent the neceffity of ufing them, in imitation of divine goodnefs, which bends the bow that it may not fhoot, and whets the fword that it may not strike."

We cannot but exprefs our entire approbation of the fentiments profeffed by these philanthropifts. Their defign was great and good, and undoubtedly capable of embellifhment from poetical fancy, as well as of fupport from the profoundeft views of political econemy; of both of which the publication juft quoted affords no mean fpecimens. It was thus that Plato called in the aid of mufic, and other arts to harmonize the difcordant paffions of men, by an appeal to the tendereft affections, and nobleft principles, of human nature. Though we entirely agree with our philofophers, that the crifis to which Britain, with the whole circle of civilization, was brought, in 1797, was not a time for devotion to any party; and farther, that we

know not any party whofe conduct is not more or lefs marked by folly, and whofe patriotifm is not more or lefs juftly fubjected to fufpicion : yet, in the prefent felfifh and luxurious age, when the profeffion of difinterefted virtue is fo generally difcredited, and even the poffeffion of it almoft confidered as a weakness, their project was, in truth, rather chimerical. That there fhould be fo much wifdom and virtue in the nation, as to emancipate public affairs from the trammels of felf-intereft, factious combination, and private ambition, and place them in the beft hands, brought together from all quarters, and united in patriotic and prudent plans of ad miniftration, was a thing fcarcely to be expected. At the fame time, it must be admitted, that to hold up to the view of the world, a plan fo humane and fo fair, has a tendency to foften the afperities of faction, as well as of national antipathy, and to prepare the minds of men and nations for the voluntary adoption of meafures that muft ultimately be obtruded by direful neceffity. But, whatever may be thought of this project, it was introduced into the house of commons, with fingular propriety, by

Mr. George Auguftus Pollen, a young gentleman of a fortune decently independent, of manners irre proachable, good parts, and pure from all political intrigues and fac tions. Mr. Pollen, on the tenth of April, introduced a motion for a farther attempt towards pacifica tion, by a fpeech of a conciliatory

Thoughts on the late negociation for peace.

+ An union of force and finance throughout Christendom against anarchy, as formerly against the Turks.

A maxim, or proverb, in the ordinances of the Hindoo legiflator, MENU.

8

nature;

nature; recommending unanimity at home, and fuch terms as might be likely to gain over to the fide of peace the enemy, with whom we were engaged in fo cruel a conteft. After a modeft exordium, befeeming a young man, and a young member of parliament, Mr. Pollen faid, when he looked at the other (the oppofition) fide of the house he could not with-hold his admiration, from the talents of which many who fat upon it were poffeffed; but he regretted extremely that they were fo often employed for the purposes of felf-intereft, and that the good of the public was fo frequently facrificed to the illiberality of partyfpirit. The confequence was, that the debates were conducted with fo much acrimony, and intermingled with fo much perfonal invective, that even the fpeaker muft have found it difficult to purfue the thread of the argument, and to preferve order and decorum in their proceedings. It was not for the empty hand to blame the prodigality of the full one, or for the perfon fitting fafe upon the top of a rock, and viewing the fhip tofled by the winds and the waves, rafhly to cenfure the conduct of the pilot. It was to be recollected, that though the right honourable gentleman (Mr. Pitt) had fitten at the helm, while the veffel of the state was expofed to ftorms and tempefts, and though the hip had fuftained confiderable damage, from the accidents which had befallen it, the pilot, perhaps, might not be to blame, and that, had it been in other hands, instead of being shattered, it might have been funk. Inftead of indulging in idle complaints, or peevish invective, he thought, that, at the prefent crifis, every hand ought to be active

He

in the fervice of the country, and every heart fhould glow with an ardent defire to extricate it from its prefent embarrasments, Having faid this much in general, he proceeded to flate the fituation in which the country was placed, Having commenced the war in concert with feveral of the most respectable and powerful nations in Europe, we were deferted by almoft all our former friends, and had now to contend against fome who were at one time our allies. Inftead of carrying our arms to the enemy's door, we were in daily terror of a hoftile invafion; inftead of calculating upon the ruin of the finances of our adverfaries, and exhaufting their refources, our whole attention was confined to the refloration of our own credit, and the falvation of our own independence. was convinced, that the people of France were as earneft in their wishes of peace as the people of Great Britain. It might be afked, perhaps, that, if they were fo defirous for the termination of hoftilities, why did they not carry their complaints to the bar of the directory, and demand redrefs? To this he would reply, that they were taught to confider the ambition of England as the fole caufe to which the prolongation of the war was to be afcribed, and, that it was to her thirst for aggrandizement the happinefs of Europe was facrificed, And, if this was the cafe, would a British houfe of commons permit that England, the parent of commerce; England, the fource of every proud and every generous feeling, and the bright example. of regular government and falutary regulation, fhould be branded as the interefted author of all

all the calamities which are at prefent abroad in the world? He trufted, that, on the contrary, England would be made to vindicate hér character, in the face of Europe, and that it would be fewn to the prefent and to the future age, that the afperfion, in this inftance, is as untrue as it is contradictory to her past hiftory; and, that even her enemies will be taught to look to her as the fource of their advantages. But it was not merely our character, but our interefts which were at ftake. Public credit was fhaken to its very foundation, and peace alone could reftore it. It might be faid, that the French nation were not fufficiently tranquillized, and that their government was not poffeffed of stability enough to infure the bleflings of a permanent peace. His majefty had declared it to be capable of maintaining the relations of peace and amity; and if there were any who could not adopt this opinion, he would afk, if they wifhed to perfevere in the conteft either till the prefent government of France was completely confolidated, or till a fyftem, in which they could repofe greater confidence, was established upon its overthrow? He advifed

[ocr errors]

gentlemen to read the debates in the council of five hundred, and to learn moderation from the fpeeches of Dumas and Dumolard. As a fpecimen of the ju and proper notions, which obtained in that affembly, he referred to the meffage, which was lately fent to the directory, demanding, of that body, an explanation of what they called an incendiary debarkation of prifoners upon our coafts; a meafure which they juftly reprobated as inconfiftent with the laws of war. And, if thefe were the fentiments of moderation and juftice, by which a French affembly was guided, would the houfe of commons of Great Britain be lefs inclined to the exercife of thefe difpofitions? He trufted not.”

Mr. Pollen proceeded to read an abftract, from a paper, contained in the Redacteur, of December, 1799, which he confidered as the official fentiments of the French directory, on the late negociation for peace: the arguments contained in which, tended to prove, on one hand, the infincerity and ambition of England, in the late negociation; and, on the other, to prove how fincerely defirous the directory were of peace, on moderate terms.* Mr. Pollen, after reading this paper, obferved,

Taken from the Redacteur, Dec. 14, 1796, three days after lord Malmesbury's de▾ parture from Paris.

"The directory fets out with afferting pofitively, that the war has been, on their part, a defenfive, and not an offenfive one; and that peace is the only object of their vows and wishes.

"In enumerating the strong reafons they had for fufpecting the fincerity of lord Malmesbury's miflion, they particularly fpecify the perfidy of England, in exciting and fupporting interior troubles, both in La Vendée and elsewhere. They mention likewife the forgery and fabrication of falfe affignats, the ftudied flowness and want of conciliation, as well as of candour and openness in the mode adopted by lord Malmesbury, for commencing a treaty; his want of authority on one hand, from any of the powers allied with Great Britain, while, on the other hand, he affected to include, not only Austria, but even Ruffia, among the parties to be confulted. It might, therefore, they Tay, be neceffary to fend couriers as far as to St. Petersburgh, which, at that feafon of the year, could not be accomplished, with the answers returned, in lefs time than five that,

that, either the allegations contained in it were founded on facì, or falle. If founded on fact, then, the negociation ought to be refumed on fair and candid principles: but, if falfe, the beft mode of difplaying the juftice of the Eng lifh government, to Europe and the world, and of expofing the unjutt pretenfions of the enemy, would

be, to publish a counter-declaration, ftating the grounds on which the war was carried on. He called upon the fide of the houfe, on which he fat, to defend their conduct, and the principles on which they acted, by thewing to the public, that it was not the inclination of the minifter, but the intereft of the nation that they confulted. He called on

weeks. That lord Malmesbury only propofed a vague principle of compenfation, without any specific articles of reciprocal reftitution, while their specific demands be only at fwered by ingenious evafion. They ten enumerate the delays or meffengers, and a private ecretary fent to London. The want of fignature to two memerals, fent in by lord Malmesbury; and, at length, when the ultimatum was demanded peremptorily, what does it contain? The fift memorial demands,

ift. Reftitution to the emperor of all is territories, without exception, as he held them before the war; coniequently, the reftitution of Eelgium.

2d. The total annihilation of every treaty made by France with the princes of the German empire, as being fondamentally inadmiffible, and contrary to the us Publicum Imperii, which makes it impofble to treat with any, excepting the head of the German empire. This, they fay, would annihilate all the treaties between France and the elector of Hanover, the duke of Wertemburg and Brunfwic, the landgrave of Hoffe: and laftly, with the king of Pruffia, in his capacity of elector o: Brandenburg. he complete evacu tion of Italy, including Savoy and Nice.

3d

4th. A refervation in favour of Ruffia, by which that court may interfere at its pleafure, as a contracting party for the peace.

5th. he same to Portugal, and by which likewife France is to be precluded from demarcing a fun of money as the price of peace from that court.

6th. Great Britain contefts the validity of the ceffion by Spain, to the republic of the Spanith part of St. Domingo, as contrary to the peace of Utrecht.

7th. I he reftitution of the property of the emigrants forte.ted or fold is obfcurely, they fay, and indirectly demanded, though in language and terms fo ingeniously ambiguous as to leave matter of endless difcuffion.

What is the fecond memorial? For Holland, the British miniftry demands a complete refloration of its ancient form of Government; the demolition or annihilation of all the treaties between France and the Batavian republic: laitly, the restoration of the ftadtholder to all his digities, offices, and poffetiions.

And what does En land offer as the price o: fo many conceffiors, reftitutions, and humiliations, on the part of France? The restoration to Holland of all her colonies? The indemnity to the Dutch for the paft?

No!

She offers only a partial reftitution of the Dutch colonies, referving to herself the Cape of Good Hope, and Ceylon.

Finally, that if France will not confent to annul her treaties, made with the Batavian republic, the is in that cafe to make over or cede to the emperor all Holland has ceded to France in the late treaty between the two countries.

The directory then afks,

Is this a fair treaty?

Does it not demand from France the entire reftitution of all that France has conquered during the war, without restoring all that England has acquired?

Does it not ftipulate by induction, and by intallible though indirect and ambiguous means, the return of the emigrants, the reftitution of their eftates, the destruction of our conftitution of 1795, and insure a counter revolution?

« AnteriorContinuar »