...-" charged that one AB had been *convicted of certain offences, and that A. B. afterwards obtained a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, and that the defendant, in order to prevent the said rule from being made absolute, made the affidavit...

...the drawer. In Gale v. Walsh, 5 TR 239, decided in 1793, the principle appears to be recognized ; but a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted for this cause was discharged, because the fact did not exist in the case. These are the earliest cases...

...$<J,000 should be awarded for the pecuniary loss sustained, and $2,000 as compensation for suffering. Rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the ground that the verdict is excessive. Willard P. Voorhees, for the rule. Joseph E. Strieker,...

...subjects-of "Value" and "Notice" special topics in ihU collection of cases. — ED. F. PoUocJc now moved for a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted on the ground that the learned judge had erroneously ruled the point at Nisi Prius. He contended that,...

...intimation to that effect. An instrument in the form of a letter held to be a valid will. IN ejectment. On rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted. BC Chetwood and Malcomb Campbell, for the plaintiff. Joel Parker, for the defendants. The opinion of...

...case was tried in the Court of King's Bench ( j) : — IIOLMAN et af versus JOHNSON, alias NEWLAND. " Assumpsit for goods sold and delivered, Plea non-assumpsit " and verdict for the plaintiff. Upon a rule to shew cause why a " new trial should not be granted, Lord Mansfield reported the case, " which was shortly...

...guilty, and this was accordingly done. The defendants moved in arrest of judgment, and have also obtained a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted. Under the sixth section of the Act of June 13, 1836, PL, 551, it is provided that " public roads or...

...evidence. A compulsory nonsuit was entered and a motion to take off the same was made. The Court entered a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, for the purpose of considering the rulings at the trial, by which plaintiff's evidence was rejected....

...not libelous. Id. 1044. But, before the motion In arrest of Judgment was argued, Mr. Ersklne obtained a rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted, principally npon the ground that the judge told the Jury that the question whether libel or not was...

...are of the opinion that the defendant should be granted a new trial. We, therefore, make absolute the rule to show cause why a new trial should not be granted. There is no merit in the contention of the defendant that he is justified in refusing to pay the check...