...department. The reasons on which Montesquieu grounds his maxim are a further demonstration of his meaning. " When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body," says he, " there can be no liberty, because apprehensions may arise lest the same monarch or...

...impressively declares, "that there may be a government of lawn and not of men." "There can be no liberty where the Legislative and Executive powers are united in the same person or body of Magistracy," or "if the power of judging be not separated from the Legislative and Executive...

...early friends and founders of our free institutions. There can be no liberty, says Montesquieu, where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body of magistracy; or if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive...

...establishes public security. By the third he punishes crimes, and decides the dissensions of individuals. When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body of persons there is no liberty, because tyrannical laws can be carried out tyrannically. So, too,...

...from the ordinary administrative. ' ' When the legislative and executive powers (says Montesquieu) are united in the same person, or in the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty." Mr. Wilson confesses himself not satisfied with the organization of the federal senate, and apologizes...

...department. The reasons on which Montesquieu grounds his maxim are a further demonstration of his meaning. " When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body," says he, " there can be no liberty, because apprehensions may arise lest the same monarch or...

...subject will be found in a professed commentary upon the constitution of England.1 "When," says he, "the legislative and executive powers are united in...liberty, because apprehensions may arise lest the name monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, or execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again,...

...liberty, because apprehensions may arise lest the "Same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws, or execute them in a tyrannical manner. Again, there is no liberty, if the judiciary power bo not separated from tho legislative and executive. Were it joined with tho legislative, tho life...

...middle of the last century Baron Montesquieu uttered words of wisdom to patriots and statesmen. He said: "When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or the same body of magistrates, there can be no liberty, because apprehensions may arise, lest the same...

...justly pronounced the very definition of tyranny. " There can be no liberty," says Montesquieu, " where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or body of magistrates." This fundamental truth in the foundation of popular government was recognized...